塑料“技术超前、文明滞后”的困境丨附塑料污染防治理论与实践论坛议程
主题：关于塑料的哲学
倒计时 26 天
塑料的发明曾被视为人类文明的里程碑，但其引发的生态危机却暴露了技术与文明发展的断裂。塑料的不可降解性超越了自然循环的边界，而社会管理体系却未能同步演进，形成了“技术超前、文明滞后”的深刻矛盾。
The invention of plastic was once regarded as a milestone of human civilization, but the ecological crisis it triggered has exposed the rupture between technology and civilization. The non-degradability of plastics has exceeded the boundaries of the natural cycle, and the social management system has failed to evolve simultaneously, forming a profound contradiction of "technology ahead and civilization behind."
The true cost of plastic is grossly underestimated. Only 6% of the world's plastic is recycled, the rest is released through landfills or incineration, and microplastic pollution has seeped into polar glaciers and human blood. Who bears the true cost? Producers, consumers, governments, or sacrificed ecosystems?
The ethical reconstruction of responsibility attribution is the key to solve the dilemma. The chain of responsibility for plastic pollution is complex: polymer companies pursue profit maximization, packaging companies rely on disposable designs, consumers are addicted to convenience, and government regulation lags behind. It is necessary to promote the ethics of responsibility from "post-accountability" to "pre-shared responsibility", for example, through the extended Producer responsibility system (EPR), packaging design, recovery costs internalized into the enterprise value chain.
The philosophical pitfalls of alternative materials are equally alarming. Biodegradable plastics are often touted as a solution, but their reliance on a "ready-to-use" logic does not challenge the cult of convenience of modernity. The real breakthrough needs to go beyond material substitution to a cultural change of "demand reduction" and "reuse."
Institutional innovation is the core of sustainable governance. The establishment of plastic reuse system needs institutional escort: for example, recyclable design standards force products to be easily disassembled and the material is simple; Consumer participation mechanisms incentivize recycling through deposit returns or carbon credits; The mandatory use ratio of recycled plastics requires supporting certification and traceability technology to prevent "green washing".
The essence of the plastic crisis is an imbalance in the relationship between humans and nature. To solve the dilemma, three major shifts are needed: from "conquering nature" to "symbiotic cycle"; From "ambiguous power and responsibility" to "global co-governance"; From "infinite production" to "closed-loop design". Through thinking and practice, I hope to write a future script for plastics that is both ethical and feasible.
How to break through the dilemma of "advanced technology and lagging civilization"?
The plastic crisis is a typical example of technological out-of-control: we have created materials that transcend natural degradation capabilities, but have not simultaneously developed a matching management system.
塑料正处在“技术超前、文明滞后”困境中。
第三届塑料污染治理理论与实践论坛议程
The 3rd Forum on Plastic Pollution Governance: Theory
and Practice
会议主题：关于塑料的哲学
会议地点：江苏张家港 华芳金陵酒店
会议时间：2025年3月18日 19：00-23：00（全球同步）
会议主持：中国合成树脂协会塑料循环利用分会——林西（副秘书长）
Chairperson of the meeting：China Plastics Reuse and Recycling Association，Lin Xi（Deputy Secretary-General ）
语言：中英文字幕同传
Languages: Bilingual
Subtitles
|
| |
3月18日 19: 00-19: 05 |
|
|
主题分享（Keynote Presentations） | |
3月18日 19: 05-19: 35 |
——OECD专家 （确认中） ——OECD Expert |
| 3月18日 19: 35-20: 00 |
——中国合成树脂协会塑料循环利用分会创始人、常务副会长 王旺 |
|
主题分享（Keynote Presentations） | |
3月18日 20: 00-20: 25 |
Veolia's global plastic recycling practices and real-world challenges ——威立雅专家（确认中） ——Veolia's Expert (To be confirmed) |
3月18日 20: 25-20: 50 |
一期工程完成后，大规模建设二期工程的逻辑思考与期待 After the completion of the first phase of the project, the logical thinking and expectation of the large-scale construction of the second phase of the project |
|
全球思想碰撞：治理塑料污染9个关键问题 Global Thought Collision: 9 Key Issues in Plastic Pollution Control | |
3月18日 20: 50-23: 00 |
1. 塑料真的廉价吗？真实的塑料成本是多少？谁应该为解决治理塑料污染支付成本？ 1. Is plastic really cheap? What Is the true cost of plastic? Who should pay for the cost of tackling plastic pollution control? |
|
2.“谁该为塑料污染负责？——是聚合物企业、是包装企业、是消费品牌、是消费者、是政府，还是‘系统’的共谋？” 2. "Who should be responsible for plastic pollution?—Polymer Producers, Packaging Companies, Brands, Consumers, Governments, or a Collective Complicity of the 'System'?" 围绕责任归属展开讨论，探讨“个体选择”、“企业行为”、“制度性鼓励”、“无需承担责任”的交织。 Centering on the responsibility attribution, it discusses the interweaving of "individual choice", "enterprise behavior", "institutional encouragement" and "no need to bear responsibility". | |
|
3. 经济学视野下，塑料泄露的核心原因：“错误的定价”、“无需承担的责任”、“不明确的物权”。 3. From an economic perspective, the core causes of plastic pollution are: "incorrect pricing," "absence of accountability," and "unclear property rights." | |
|
| |
|
5. 塑料制品大多一次性使用，如何建立塑料制品重复使用的制度体系？并能够持续运行。 | |
|
| |
|
7. 再生塑料的认证制度，能否保证，强制使用再生材料的制度持续真实的运行？ | |
|
8. Can plastic pollution control and economic development achieve a balance? “增长优先论”：将塑料污染视为发展的必要代价，默认“先污染后治理”的线性路径。但这一叙事忽视了两个事实： | |
|
9. To address plastic environmental pollution,should we focus on "managing plastic pollution," or on "establishing efficient utilization of plastic resources"? | |
本篇文章来源于微信公众号:废塑料新观察
推荐文章
-
第16次北美（美国、墨西哥） 塑料回收再生行业考察 开始报名了！！！ 随着塑料废弃物问题日益引起公众关注，物理与化学回收技术逐渐成为循环经济讨论的焦点。美国塑料公约（U.S. Plastics Pact）于2025年11月发布立场文件，明确表示支持在严格的管理框架下，将物理与化学回收作为塑料包装循环经济的补充性解决方案，而非替代减量、重复使用或机械回收的手段。 美国塑料公约（U.S. Plastics Pact）是一项旨在推动美国塑料包装可持续发展的行业倡议，于2020年正式启动，是艾伦·麦克阿瑟基金会全球塑料公约网络的重要组成部分 该文件表示，这些技术不应被神化为“万能解药”，也不应被全盘否定，而应基于科学与系统思维，负责任地整合到更广泛的废物管理体系中。以下内容摘自该立场文件，如需阅读立场文件原文，可识别二维码： — 1 —什么是物理回收与化学回收？根据国际标准化组织（ISO）正在制定的术语框架 ISO/CD 15270-1.3，回收技术可分为以下四类： 机械回收：传统方式，通过清洗、破碎、挤出等物理过程处理塑料，不改变聚合物结构。 物理... -
塑料可回收再生设计（Design for Recycling, DfR）作为推动循环经济的关键技术体系，在全球范围内已形成较为成熟的标准与实践路径。然而，中国在这一领域的发展尚处于初级阶段，专业研究人员稀缺，部分探索甚至陷入误区。 本文以双易设计（Double E Design）标准为例，结合国际主流体系（如APR、RecyClass等）进行对比，剖析其存在的根本性问题，并呼吁行业回归科学、透明的技术路径。个体陷入误区，仅仅是个体成长过程，但是作为标准编制的专业机构，拿自己错误的认知去影响行业，尤其是给中国刚刚还在发展期初的DfR体系，造成混乱和混淆，这个就不对了，这是本文发布的初衷。 以下从13个可回收再生设计关键维度对比双易与APR、RecyClass、CPRRA-DfR的差异，系统分析其内在技术缺陷与认知错误： 注：该领域过于细分，加上有意无意的混淆和模糊，非长期研究DfR的研究者很难发现其内在缺陷和错误。 由以上技术细节的对比分析，我们发现了3个被忽视的事实： — 1 — 宣称“国际对标”，实为自我否定 双易设计在宣传中存在显著的前后矛盾。...
-
随着全球塑料污染治理的加速发展，“以设计为导向”正成为塑料包装治理的主流趋势。欧盟已明确要求到 2030 年，所有上市包装必须具备“设计可回收”的能力。联合国塑料公约谈判也将“优化塑料产品设计”列为塑料污染的核心治理手段之一。在中国，“十四五” 塑料污染治理行动方案明确提出 “积极推行塑料制品绿色设计”，塑料包装相关设计标准的制定也在持续提速。— 1 —全球趋势：设计正在成为塑料包装管理的“硬规定”越来越多国家将“设计可回收”纳入法律体系。以欧盟为例，2024 年通过的《包装与包装废弃物法规》（PPWR）规定，到 2030 年，所有上市包装必须具备“设计可回收”能力；2035 年起，包装是否能在现实条件下实现“规模化回收”也将纳入强制评估。这一机制首次将设计与回收体系协同纳入监管框架。随着塑料污染治理和循环经济进程的加快，绿色设计正逐渐成为中国“双碳”战略与产业绿色转型的重要抓手。在中国国家标准体系优化过程中，绿色、低碳与资源高效利用被明确为核心方向。目前绿色产品标准体系以资源、能源、环境、产品品质与低碳五大维...
