塑料“技术超前、文明滞后”的困境丨附塑料污染防治理论与实践论坛议程
主题：关于塑料的哲学
倒计时 26 天
塑料的发明曾被视为人类文明的里程碑，但其引发的生态危机却暴露了技术与文明发展的断裂。塑料的不可降解性超越了自然循环的边界，而社会管理体系却未能同步演进，形成了“技术超前、文明滞后”的深刻矛盾。
The invention of plastic was once regarded as a milestone of human civilization, but the ecological crisis it triggered has exposed the rupture between technology and civilization. The non-degradability of plastics has exceeded the boundaries of the natural cycle, and the social management system has failed to evolve simultaneously, forming a profound contradiction of "technology ahead and civilization behind."
The true cost of plastic is grossly underestimated. Only 6% of the world's plastic is recycled, the rest is released through landfills or incineration, and microplastic pollution has seeped into polar glaciers and human blood. Who bears the true cost? Producers, consumers, governments, or sacrificed ecosystems?
The ethical reconstruction of responsibility attribution is the key to solve the dilemma. The chain of responsibility for plastic pollution is complex: polymer companies pursue profit maximization, packaging companies rely on disposable designs, consumers are addicted to convenience, and government regulation lags behind. It is necessary to promote the ethics of responsibility from "post-accountability" to "pre-shared responsibility", for example, through the extended Producer responsibility system (EPR), packaging design, recovery costs internalized into the enterprise value chain.
The philosophical pitfalls of alternative materials are equally alarming. Biodegradable plastics are often touted as a solution, but their reliance on a "ready-to-use" logic does not challenge the cult of convenience of modernity. The real breakthrough needs to go beyond material substitution to a cultural change of "demand reduction" and "reuse."
Institutional innovation is the core of sustainable governance. The establishment of plastic reuse system needs institutional escort: for example, recyclable design standards force products to be easily disassembled and the material is simple; Consumer participation mechanisms incentivize recycling through deposit returns or carbon credits; The mandatory use ratio of recycled plastics requires supporting certification and traceability technology to prevent "green washing".
The essence of the plastic crisis is an imbalance in the relationship between humans and nature. To solve the dilemma, three major shifts are needed: from "conquering nature" to "symbiotic cycle"; From "ambiguous power and responsibility" to "global co-governance"; From "infinite production" to "closed-loop design". Through thinking and practice, I hope to write a future script for plastics that is both ethical and feasible.
How to break through the dilemma of "advanced technology and lagging civilization"?
The plastic crisis is a typical example of technological out-of-control: we have created materials that transcend natural degradation capabilities, but have not simultaneously developed a matching management system.
塑料正处在“技术超前、文明滞后”困境中。
第三届塑料污染治理理论与实践论坛议程
The 3rd Forum on Plastic Pollution Governance: Theory
and Practice
会议主题：关于塑料的哲学
会议地点：江苏张家港 华芳金陵酒店
会议时间：2025年3月18日 19：00-23：00（全球同步）
会议主持：中国合成树脂协会塑料循环利用分会——林西（副秘书长）
Chairperson of the meeting：China Plastics Reuse and Recycling Association，Lin Xi（Deputy Secretary-General ）
语言：中英文字幕同传
Languages: Bilingual
Subtitles
|
| |
3月18日 19: 00-19: 05 |
|
|
主题分享（Keynote Presentations） | |
3月18日 19: 05-19: 35 |
——OECD专家 （确认中） ——OECD Expert |
| 3月18日 19: 35-20: 00 |
——中国合成树脂协会塑料循环利用分会创始人、常务副会长 王旺 |
|
主题分享（Keynote Presentations） | |
3月18日 20: 00-20: 25 |
Veolia's global plastic recycling practices and real-world challenges ——威立雅专家（确认中） ——Veolia's Expert (To be confirmed) |
3月18日 20: 25-20: 50 |
一期工程完成后，大规模建设二期工程的逻辑思考与期待 After the completion of the first phase of the project, the logical thinking and expectation of the large-scale construction of the second phase of the project |
|
全球思想碰撞：治理塑料污染9个关键问题 Global Thought Collision: 9 Key Issues in Plastic Pollution Control | |
3月18日 20: 50-23: 00 |
1. 塑料真的廉价吗？真实的塑料成本是多少？谁应该为解决治理塑料污染支付成本？ 1. Is plastic really cheap? What Is the true cost of plastic? Who should pay for the cost of tackling plastic pollution control? |
|
2.“谁该为塑料污染负责？——是聚合物企业、是包装企业、是消费品牌、是消费者、是政府，还是‘系统’的共谋？” 2. "Who should be responsible for plastic pollution?—Polymer Producers, Packaging Companies, Brands, Consumers, Governments, or a Collective Complicity of the 'System'?" 围绕责任归属展开讨论，探讨“个体选择”、“企业行为”、“制度性鼓励”、“无需承担责任”的交织。 Centering on the responsibility attribution, it discusses the interweaving of "individual choice", "enterprise behavior", "institutional encouragement" and "no need to bear responsibility". | |
|
3. 经济学视野下，塑料泄露的核心原因：“错误的定价”、“无需承担的责任”、“不明确的物权”。 3. From an economic perspective, the core causes of plastic pollution are: "incorrect pricing," "absence of accountability," and "unclear property rights." | |
|
| |
|
5. 塑料制品大多一次性使用，如何建立塑料制品重复使用的制度体系？并能够持续运行。 | |
|
| |
|
7. 再生塑料的认证制度，能否保证，强制使用再生材料的制度持续真实的运行？ | |
|
8. Can plastic pollution control and economic development achieve a balance? “增长优先论”：将塑料污染视为发展的必要代价，默认“先污染后治理”的线性路径。但这一叙事忽视了两个事实： | |
|
9. To address plastic environmental pollution,should we focus on "managing plastic pollution," or on "establishing efficient utilization of plastic resources"? | |
本篇文章来源于微信公众号:废塑料新观察
推荐文章
-
扫描上方二维码，报名观看直播震荡期找方向，王旺独家洞察 私信我，拉你进"王旺塑料观察日记群"联系方式：18901360033本篇文章来源于微信公众号:废塑料新观察 -
根据贝恩公司发布的《2026年纸与包装行业报告》，化学回收被视为塑料行业向循环经济转型的关键技术，但其发展道路上面临着成本、政策和规模化等挑战。报告明确指出，企业采取行动的时机窗口正在收窄，早期布局者将构筑长期竞争优势。 识别二维码，下载报告 — 1 —现状：技术已备，但经济性与规模化尚未完全成熟 化学回收技术（包括热解、气化和糖酵解等）能够改变塑料废弃物的化学结构，将其转化为制造新塑料的原料。然而，该报告指出，该技术的经济性仍是主要障碍。以欧洲为例，通过热解回收聚烯烃的成本超过原生塑料生产成本的两倍。在其他地区，这一成本差距甚至更大，导致化学回收目前仅局限于愿意支付溢价的利基市场。 尽管面临欧盟即将出台的法规（如《包装与包装废物条例》，PPWR）和消费品公司雄心勃勃的回收承诺，大多数塑料公司仍对大规模投资化学回收犹豫不决，部分公司甚至撤回了已公布的计划。 — 2 —挑战：漫长的成本持平之路与巨大资本需求 报告的核心分析指出，化学回收无法单靠市场力量实现与原生塑料的成本持平，因为初始规模有限，难以产...
-
ChinaReplas 新观察行业简报 2026001期2026DPP（Digital Product Passport，产品数字护照）是再生塑料产业实现透明化与合规化发展的核心工具，本质是记录再生塑料全生命周期的数字化体系，整合废料来源、回收工艺、再生成分比例、碳足迹等关键信息，为材料溯源与循环利用提供数据支撑。政策层面，欧盟《可持续产品生态设计法规》（ESPR）强制要求再生塑料相关制品配备DPP，披露再生成分占比等信息，ESPR已于2024年7月生效，将分批对特定产品组强制实施DPP要求，企业通常在相关授权法案生效后有18个月的过渡期DPP可破解废料溯源难题、降低跨境贸易合规成本，推动再生塑料在包装、汽车等领域规模化应用。其落地是应对国际绿色贸易规则、构建再生塑料循环生态的关键，也是行业高质量发展的必然趋势。基于欧盟ESPR法规框架、ISO标准及行业试点实践，覆盖产品全生命周期数据要求、实施落地、风险防控与战略适配，精准对标2027年强制合规节点，适用于再生料生产、塑料改性、塑料制品加工全链条企业。核心数据项自查表产品身份标识（基础必填...
